Methods
and materials |
||
Separate
questionnaires for the hunters / traders, and bear owners / trainers were
devised. The questionnaires were administered face to face using the native
language Hindustani with adequate Urdu words to put the interviewee at
ease, in North India. In Karnataka, Kannada and Hindi were used. The investigators
also interviewed a cross section of concerned people; those who owned
a bear at present, those who have owned bears in the past but may not
have a bear now; those involved in training and dancing, medicating and
treating the animals, and those who pierce the nose, cut the claws and
pull out the teeth. The investigators also observed the bear being danced
in villages, along the tourist routes and while at rest in their homes.
They interviewed the audiences, Indian and foreign, rural and city, and
discussed the implications of trapping cubs with them. Their attitudes
to the training and dancing of the bear was assessed. The investigators
also interviewed Adivasis and the tribals actively involved in the hunting
and poaching; as also those who did the buying and selling and transporting
and witnessed several such transactions. Various officials connected with
the Zoo Conservation projects, Wild Life and the Forest Department were
interviewed, along with forest rangers and guards. |
||
With
the assistance of the Kalandhars, the clan that has been training and
dancing bears traditionally for over 300 - 400 years in India, a route
was set up “mapping” 29 villages belonging to their clan in
four North Indian states, namely Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Haryana, and
Delhi. A map showing the route is appended in the Appendices. Similarly
a |
||
route
was set up “mapping” 7 villages belonging to the Kalandars
in Karnataka, South India. These 36 villages were visited by the investigators
and 146 questionnaires were administered in their huts where the interaction
of man and bear could also be observed; over 40 more people were questioned,
and a large quantity of descriptive data was collected from the discussions
that ensued. |
||
The
North Indian villages visited during this investigation were selected
keeping in mind the homogeneity and cohesiveness of the clan; the fact
that they marry, settle, and bring up their families within this circle,
and although the Kalandhars have migrated to other States of Karnataka,
Gujarat and Maharashtra, this particular sub-group in North India has
kept to itself. Some of these settlements are also often very old and
well established. The investigators set up one route through Karnataka
where the Kalandar community has established itself only over the last
40-50 years, in order to compare and contrast any changes in handling,
diet, treatment of the captive animal, and to discover new sources for
the supply of bear cubs, new trading centres/markets, or information on
other settlements of Kalandhars in South India. |
||
While
in Phase I of the project the Kalandar villages were visited, in Phase
II the investigators accompanied the Kalandar purchasers on a cub-purchasing
trip and administered questionnaires to the traders and hunters. A route
was set up with the assistance of the Kalandars and modes of capture and
transportation were studied, along with a study of the prices the cubs
commanded from source to their final destination. The mortality rates
during capture, transportation and consequent changes of owners, was also
studied, along with an analysis on why the average villager is indifferent
to the capture of these cubs; and why the authorities find it difficult
to apprehend the poacher and trader. |
||
|
©WILDLIFE SOS - INDIA |
||